Evidence-based nutrition

We read the studies. You get the answers.

The research depth of PubMed. The reading experience of a magazine. The simplicity of pressing play.

The Definitive Guide

The complete evidence guide to exercise and body composition

The three variables marketed hardest in fitness — exercise type, weight load, and workout intensity — were each tested independently by different research teams across different decades. This guide holds all nine analyses together for the first time, including the tensions between them and the one question nobody can answer yet.

Cardio is better than weights for fat loss
You need to lift heavy to build muscle
HIIT burns significantly more fat (afterburn effect)
Women will get bulky from lifting weights
7 studies 6 meta-analyses Triple-verified Explore cluster →
Your Training App Counts Sets Wrong. 67 Studies Prove It.
The Afterburn Effect Is Real — and It Doesn’t Matter
The Interference Effect, Tested in 43 Studies
Women Build Muscle at the Same Rate. So Why the Fear?
Do You Need Heavy Weights to Build Muscle? 21 Studies
Cardio vs. Weights: The 1 kg Gap Nobody Mentions
The Constrained Energy Model: More Exercise Won’t Burn More
All shorts →
Training

Researchers tested frequency, type, intensity, age, and training status. Not one of them found a cardio ceiling for muscle growth.

How Much Cardio Can You Do and Still Build Muscle?
3 min read 618 words
training

Strength is calibrated to whatever you practice.

Free Weights Activate More Muscles. The Growth Is Identical.
2 min read 529 words
Muscle & Strength

Age, when training was present, was irrelevant to the outcome.

Muscle After 50: Same Engine, Different Fuel
2 min read 530 words
BUILT TO PROVE OURSELVES WRONG
5 verification gates. 3 pipelines. 28+ kill switches.
Nothing publishes without surviving our Skeptic Protocol — the system we built to catch our own mistakes.
Explore full Training cluster
Library
FitChef Audio · 1:18
1:18