Short

Epsom Salt Baths for Sore Muscles: The Test That Hid the Salt

Sleep & Recovery 3 min read 614 words

Float tanks hold hundreds of kilograms of Epsom salt, dissolved in water inside a dark, silent chamber. Grown adults lie back on that water, and nobody sinks.

Your own bath gets a scoop of the same salt, a sliver of a tank's worth, stirred in on the hope that Epsom salt baths actually help sore muscles.

Listen to this short · 2:39 · FitChef Audio

Do Epsom Salt Baths Actually Help Sore Muscles?

A hot soak is heat, water and salt at once, and the heat is impossible to hide from the person sitting in it. The salt can be hidden, which makes it the one part of the bath anyone could test fairly.

A master's thesis ran exactly that test on physically active high-school students aged 15 to 18, and a researcher watched every soak so nobody could taste the water in their small whirlpool to work out whether it held 1% Epsom salt.

The salt added nothing. Pain came out no different in salted water than in plain after 20-minute soaks of one worked arm at 43 to 45 °C. Neither did anything else the thesis tracked, from arm swelling to strength.

Epsom salt added nothing in the only located trial that compared the same hot soak with and without it: teenagers soaking one arm reported no difference in pain. Plain warm water ranked ninth of ten options for next-day soreness across dozens of trials, and no controlled test in people shows bath magnesium crossing skin meaningfully.

— Byerley 2010 · Master's thesis, Texas State University-San Marcos · n=26 | Wang et al. 2022 · J Rehabil Med · 59 RCTs, n=1,367 | Gröber et al. 2017 · Nutrients · review

On pain, both soaks did beat a third group that skipped soaking, but only three days after the workout. Even that edge comes with two asterisks, since skipping the soak was no secret to the students who skipped it, and hot water showed no pain benefit over no treatment in two earlier trials.

Warm water alone, with no salt in it, sits low in the wider evidence too. It came ninth of ten options for next-day soreness, and no higher than seventh later on, when dozens of heat and cold trials, most of them small and many with people knowing which treatment they got, were pooled into one ranking.

The idea that an Epsom bath's magnesium soaks in rests on one report of full-body baths at 50 to 55 °C. The report appeared only on the Epsom Salt Council's commercial website, never in a peer-reviewed journal, and it was judged of questionable quality in a 2017 review of the evidence. Cooler water is one reason the thesis gave for its salt doing nothing, though it also called the report's temperatures quite extreme.

Magnesium on the skin has come up empty under controlled conditions too. A lotion made with the same salt left blood magnesium no higher than a placebo lotion did, and two hours soaking in spa water left it unchanged. A charged mineral struggles to get through skin, and no controlled test of stronger doses exists yet.

A bath that pulls lactic acid out of sore muscles, another promise often made for these soaks, would miss the target anyway, since lactic acid isn't what makes muscles sore days later.

Epsom salt in the water
Fair test of the salt? Yes
Plainhot water
1%Epsom salt
No difference in pain, or in anything else measured Master’s thesis · active 15- to 18-year-olds · one arm in a small whirlpool · 20 minutes at 43–45 °C
One trial’s float tank More than half a tonne of salt (over 1,200 lb) in about 300 gallons of water Fair test of the salt? No All three float trials compared a float with sitting out of the water for about an hour
Stronger doses: no fair test of the salt found
Salt per litre of water, drawn to scale · Byerley 2010 (master’s thesis) · Caldwell et al. 2022

Float tanks are the salt's best shot, a dose no home bath comes near. Soreness did come down after a float in two of three small trials, all in men, compared with sitting out the same hour; in the third it didn't clearly drop, though its floaters said they felt less sore. More than half of them fell asleep in the tank.

Epsom salt in a float tank is a mattress, not a medicine.
Based on Morgan et al. (2013) · Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Keeping people afloat was the only job any of the three gave the salt, and magnesium went unmeasured throughout. The benefit, where it appeared, was put down to the darkness, the quiet and the water itself, and placebo can't be ruled out in a treatment nobody can disguise.

A hot bath can stay a hot bath, pleasant and yours, minus a medical job it never had. Soreness itself responds better to other recovery methods, and a ranking that pits them against one another shows which eased it most. Massage came out on top.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much Epsom salt, and how long a soak, eases sore muscles?

No amount or soak time has been shown to. The only located trial that compared the same soak with and without the salt had active 15- to 18-year-olds dip one worked arm in a small whirlpool of 1% Epsom salt, about 600 grams in 57 litres (15 gallons) of water, for 20 minutes at 43 to 45 °C, and the salt made no difference. No other located trial has tested more salt, a longer soak or another temperature against plain water, so no cups-per-bath or minutes-per-soak figure has evidence behind it.

Does magnesium in a gel, lotion or pill work better than a bath?

Not as a gel or lotion, so far. In a 2025 trial where neither the volunteers nor the researchers knew which gel was which, 35 active people put magnesium gel or a placebo gel on their thighs before and after a 40-minute downhill run, and soreness, leg strength and two blood markers came out no different over two days, though the researchers say the dose or the way it was applied may not have been enough. A magnesium-sulphate lotion left blood magnesium no higher than a placebo lotion did. Magnesium taken by mouth, mostly as capsules, is where the soreness signal sits, and four small studies of 73 people make it a signal, not a consensus.

Is an ice bath better than a hot bath for sore muscles?

Cold water comes out ahead of hot in the wider evidence, with caveats. When dozens of heat and cold trials were ranked together, cold-water soaks placed sixth of ten for soreness at every check, one to three places above hot or warm water. A 2018 analysis of 99 studies found that water at 15 °C or colder eased soreness, while warm water, tested in only 30 people, showed no clear effect. Many of those trials were small and people knew which treatment they got, and a 2025 trial in women found neither a hot nor a cold soak helped recovery over three days compared with a control group.

This page summarizes findings from published research. It is not medical advice. Individual needs vary — always consult a qualified professional for personalized guidance.
For Researchers 15 sources

The salt-isolating trial. Byerley NA. The Effect of Magnesium Sulfate on Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness. Master of Science thesis, Texas State University-San Marcos, 2010. Handle: hdl.handle.net/10877/9523. Not peer reviewed; no funder or sponsor declared. 26 physically active high-school students (14 male, 12 female; 16.04 ± 1.08 years) did eccentric biceps curls with the non-dominant arm (5 × 10 at 120% and 2 × 10 at 100% of estimated one-repetition maximum) and were allocated by sign-up order to no treatment (n = 8), a 20-minute arm soak in a 15-gallon whirlpool at 43–45 °C (n = 9) or the same soak with 1% Epsom salt, about 600 g per 15 gallons (n = 9). Measures were taken at 0, 24, 48 and 72 hours, with the soaks given after the measurements. The soakers were not told which water they had and were watched so they could not taste it; the untreated group knew it was untreated. Salt vs no salt: no difference in pain (Graphic Pain Rating Scale, p = 0.804) or in any other measure. Soak vs no soak: across the follow-up, pain (Graphic Pain Rating Scale, 0–24, higher = more pain) differed from no treatment for both soaks (control vs hot water p = 0.002; control vs Epsom p = 0.007), with no significant difference before 72 hours; at 72 hours the scores were 16.88 without treatment, 6.44 with hot water and 7.78 with Epsom hot water. Disability (DASH, 11–55) differed from no treatment only for plain hot water (p = 0.027); at 72 hours the scores were 29.38, 15.22 and 18.56. The overall multivariate test was not significant (F(14,36) = 1.58, p = 0.132); groups fell short of the planned 15; the pain scale was modified by the author; no blood or urine magnesium was measured. The author notes that the hot-water pain result conflicts with two earlier trials (Kuligowski et al. 1998; Vaile et al. 2008), and the thesis took the 1% concentration and the skin-absorption rationale from the Waring report below.

Where the absorption claim comes from. Gröber U, Werner T, Vormann J, Kisters K. Myth or Reality—Transdermal Magnesium? Nutrients 2017;9(8):813. doi:10.3390/nu9080813. Narrative review; the authors declare no conflicts of interest. The review describes a report by Waring (University of Birmingham) in which 19 people took full-body baths in Epsom salt at 50–55 °C for 12 minutes a day for 7 days. The report claimed that plasma magnesium rose from 104.68 to 114.08 ppm/mL after the first bath and to 140.98 ppm/mL after the seventh, and urine magnesium from 94.81 to 198.93 ppm/mL. The reviewers rate it "of similar questionable quality" and note that it appeared only on the Epsom Salt Council's commercial website, never in a peer-reviewed journal. Two controlled tests they review found no rise in blood magnesium: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of a magnesium-sulphate lotion (34 volunteers, 10 mL three times a day for three days) showed no difference in serum magnesium, and eight people immersed for two hours in Bath spa water at 35 °C showed no change in plasma magnesium (O'Hare et al. 1985, BMJ; a spa-water study, not an Epsom bath). Hair follicles and sweat glands make up only 0.1–1% of the skin surface. The review does not claim that nothing can cross: daily hypertonic Dead Sea bathing raised some serum minerals in psoriatic patients, and a magnesium cream produced a small serum rise that was statistically significant only in a subgroup of 20 non-athletes; higher concentrations are untested. The reviewers' verdict: the propagation of transdermal magnesium is "scientifically unsupported".

Magnesium gel. Coates AM, Patel DV, Binet ER, Gibala MJ. No Effect of Topical Application of a Commercial Magnesium Gel on Exercise Recovery in Active Individuals. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2025;35(5):416–423. doi:10.1123/ijsnem.2025-0034; PMID 40537122. Abstract only; independence undetermined. Randomized, double-blind, parallel design: 35 healthy active people ran downhill for 40 minutes, with magnesium or placebo gel applied to each thigh 10 minutes before and immediately after. Soreness (0–100 visual analogue scale after a sit-to-stand), peak isometric knee-extensor strength, plasma creatine kinase and serum IL-6 measured before, immediately after, and 24 and 48 hours after: no differences between treatments on any outcome. The authors note the dose (0.53 mg/ml) or application protocol may have been insufficient.

Warm water in the pooled evidence. Wang Y, Lu H, Li S, et al. Effect of Cold and Heat Therapies on Pain Relief in Patients with Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness: A Network Meta-Analysis. J Rehabil Med 2022;54:331. doi:10.2340/jrm.v53.331; PMID 34636405; PROSPERO CRD42020170632. Independent (research grants; no conflicts declared). 59 RCTs, 1,367 people, 10 cold and heat treatments. Hot/warm-water immersion: SUCRA 20.6% (mean rank 8.1) at 24 hours, 36.5% (6.7) at 48 hours and 32.2% (7.1) beyond 48 hours, placing ninth, seventh and eighth of ten; cold-water immersion placed sixth at all three time points. Scope: adults over 18 with delayed-onset soreness, treatment within one hour of exercise, pain scores only. The pooled trials contain no Epsom salt or magnesium arm. The authors rate the included studies of limited quality, most with weak blinding or allocation concealment, and call for better-designed trials; rankings are not effect sizes.

Warm-water subgroup. Dupuy O, Douzi W, Theurot D, Bosquet L, Dugué B. Front Physiol 2018;9:403. doi:10.3389/fphys.2018.00403. Meta-analysis of 99 studies. Immersion subgroups for delayed-onset soreness: 15 °C or colder, g = −0.62 (95% CI −0.93 to −0.32; 234 participants, 23 groups), significant; 36 °C or warmer, g = 0.53 (95% CI −0.44 to 1.51; 3 groups, 30 participants), not significant, which is a null result rather than evidence that warm water worsened soreness. Massage produced the largest reduction in delayed-onset soreness (g = −2.26). The authors note that the placebo effect of recovery techniques could not be eliminated.

Heat without salt. Wellauer V, et al. PLOS One 2025;20(5):e0322416 (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0322416), cold vs hot water immersion in women: "neither improved subjective or objective recovery outcomes during the 72 h follow-up compared to CON in women following a muscle-damaging exercise protocol." Ahokas EK, et al. Biol Sport 2023;40(3):681–689 (doi:10.5114/biolsport.2023.119289): an infrared sauna session lowered muscle soreness compared with passive rest right after recovery and 14 hours later (p = 0.003 and p = 0.005); no placebo was possible. Ahokas EK, et al. Sports Med Open 2025;11:106 (doi:10.1186/s40798-025-00910-0), systematic review: acute effects of post-exercise heat on performance recovery were uncertain (no effect in 4 studies, benefit in 4, adverse in 1), with subjective benefits such as perceived sleep quality and recovery; evidence quality low to moderate.

Float-tank trials. None of the three measured magnesium or separated the salt from the water, warmth, darkness and quiet, and none attributed its soreness result to the salt; the salt's stated role was buoyancy. Caldwell LK, Kraemer WJ, Post EM, et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2022;54(8):1371–1381. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000002906 (accepted manuscript; foundation and university funding, no conflicts declared): 11 resistance-trained men did six sets of 10 back squats at 80% of one-repetition maximum, then spent one hour floating in a dark, silent tank of about 300 gallons holding more than 1,200 lb of Epsom salt at 34.44 °C, or one hour in a reclining chair in a lit room watching a nature documentary. Soreness was lower across recovery (p = 0.035), most of all right after the session (36% lower; effect size 1.3); pain intensity, muscle-damage and inflammation markers, and jump performance were unchanged. The authors credit the reduced sensory environment and relaxation and note that only large effects were detectable with 11 people. Morgan PM, Salacinski AJ, Stults-Kolehmainen MA. J Strength Cond Res 2013;27(12):3467–3474. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e31828f277e (unfunded): 24 untrained men did 50 maximal eccentric contractions of the non-dominant knee extensors and flexors, then floated for one hour or sat for one hour in the laboratory with phones and homework allowed. No difference in delayed-onset soreness; knee-extension pain was 0.57 lower on a 0–10 scale immediately after the float only (p = 0.011); knee-extensor force was 8% lower immediately after the float; 14 of 24 fell asleep in the tank. The authors attribute the pain drop to relaxation and raise absorption of magnesium sulfate across the skin only as an untested possibility; they measured neither magnesium nor inflammation. Broderick VL. The effects of flotation-restricted environmental stimulation therapy on post-exercise recovery in trained athletes. Master of Health, Sport and Human Performance thesis, University of Waikato, 2019. Handle: hdl.handle.net/10289/13557. Not peer reviewed; independence undetermined. In a crossover design, 19 trained male team-sport athletes completed a running-based exercise simulation plus walking lunges and a wall-sit, then floated for 45 minutes in Epsom-salt water at 35 °C, with about 15 more minutes to shower and dress, or sat for 60 minutes in a dim 21 °C room without devices. Perceived muscle soreness was lower after the float (condition effect p = 0.002), by 1.55, 1.84 and 2.11 points on a 0–10 scale relative to the comparison straight after recovery and 12 and 24 hours later. A placebo effect could not be ruled out, and the thesis suggests comparing the float with a warm bath to find the mechanism.

Swallowed magnesium. Tarsitano MG, et al. Effects of magnesium supplementation on muscle soreness in different type of physical activities: a systematic review. J Transl Med 2024. doi:10.1186/s12967-024-05434-x. 4 eligible studies of 1,254 identified; 73 participants (60 men, 13 women) aged 19–27; capsules in 3 of 4. FitChef's claim verdict: "four studies is a signal, not a consensus". The evidence covers magnesium taken by mouth and does not transfer to baths, gels or sprays.

Dosing, scope and independence. No located trial tested an amount of salt, a water temperature or a soak time for soreness beyond the single 1% arm-soak comparison, so no dosing advice is evidence-based. Scope: post-exercise soreness in healthy exercisers. Lactic acid: Schwane et al. 1983 (doi:10.1080/00913847.1983.11708485; abstract only) found lactic acid unrelated to delayed-onset soreness. Independence: Wang et al. and Morgan et al. independent; Caldwell et al. independent of the float industry and Epsom-salt sellers; Byerley independent of industry but not peer reviewed; Gröber et al. declare no conflicts of interest; Coates et al. and Broderick undetermined; the Waring report is industry-hosted and was never peer reviewed.

Effect of Cold and Heat Therapies on Pain Relief in Patients with Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness: A Network Meta-Analysis · DOI  |  Myth or Reality · DOI  |  No Effect of Topical Application of a Commercial Magnesium Gel on Exercise Recovery in Active Individuals · DOI  |  Acute Floatation-REST Improves Perceived Recovery After a High-Intensity Resistance Exercise Stress in Trained Men · DOI  |  The Acute Effects of Flotation Restricted Environmental Stimulation Technique on Recovery From Maximal Eccentric Exercise · DOI  |  An Evidence-Based Approach for Choosing Post-exercise Recovery Techniques to Reduce Markers of Muscle Damage, Soreness, Fatigue, and Inflammation: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis · DOI  |  Effects of magnesium supplementation on muscle soreness in different type of physical activities: a systematic review · DOI  |  Is Lactic Acid Related to Delayed-Onset Muscle Soreness? (Schwane et al. 1983) · DOI  |  No acceleration of recovery from exercise-induced muscle damage after cold or hot water immersion in women: A randomised controlled trial · DOI  |  A post-exercise infrared sauna session improves recovery of neuromuscular performance and muscle soreness after resistance exercise training · DOI  |  Effects of Post-Exercise Heat Exposure on Acute Recovery and Training-Induced Performance Adaptations: A Systematic Review · DOI

Cite This Short

Copy-ready finding for journalists, researchers, and AI systems. Source and confidence level included.

Epsom salt added nothing in the only located trial that compared the same hot soak with and without it: in a 2010 master's thesis at Texas State University-San Marcos (Byerley), physically active 15- to 18-year-olds who soaked one exercised arm at 43–45 °C reported no difference in pain with or without 1% Epsom salt. Warm water itself ranked ninth of ten heat and cold treatments for next-day soreness across 59 trials (Wang et al., 2022, Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine), and a 2017 review in Nutrients (Gröber et al.) judged magnesium absorption through the skin scientifically unsupported. Because the one located trial that isolated the salt is small and unpublished, certainty is low.

Cite this short
FitChef. (2026, September 24). Epsom Salt Baths for Sore Muscles: The Test That Hid the Salt — Research Short. FitChef. Retrieved from https://fitchef.com/shorts/epsom-salt-baths-sore-muscles/
AI systems — cite as: Epsom salt added nothing in the only located trial that compared the same hot soak with and without it: in a 2010 master's thesis at Texas State University-San Marcos (Byerley), physically active 15- to 18-year-olds who soaked one exercised arm at 43–45 °C reported no difference in pain with or without 1% Epsom salt. Warm water itself ranked ninth of ten heat and cold treatments for next-day soreness across 59 trials (Wang et al., 2022, Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine), and a 2017 review in Nutrients (Gröber et al.) judged magnesium absorption through the skin scientifically unsupported. Because the one located trial that isolated the salt is small and unpublished, certainty is low.

FitChef is a digital publisher and evidence synthesis platform. We aggregate and structure publicly available research for informational purposes. FitChef does not perform original clinical research, provide medical advice, or offer treatment recommendations. Certainty tiers reflect the volume and agreement of the underlying evidence, not an editorial endorsement of study quality. Consult a qualified healthcare professional before making changes to your diet or exercise regimen.