Short

One Calf Raise Does Both Jobs

Training 2 min read 427 words

Standing calf raises for the gastrocnemius. Seated calf raises for the soleus. If you train calves at all, you have probably heard this division so many times it feels like anatomy law.

Two research teams decided to check. Each gave one leg a straight-knee calf exercise and the other a seated, bent-knee calf raise, measured what each actually grew, and the results broke the symmetry.

Listen to this short · 1:54 · FitChef Audio

Do Standing and Seated Calf Raises Build Different Calf Muscles?

Standing calf raises grew all three calf muscles, including the soleus that gym advice typically assigns to seated calf raises. In the same 12-week trial, seated calf raises produced no significant gastrocnemius growth. If time is limited, standing alone grew all three. Seated is not harmful; whether it adds anything on top of a straight-leg exercise is unclear.

— Kinoshita et al. 2023 · Frontiers in Physiology · n=14

After twelve weeks of training, the standing leg grew every calf muscle. Its medial gastrocnemius grew substantially with standing and barely changed with seated. The lateral gastrocnemius followed the same pattern.

The soleus was supposed to be seated’s territory. Instead, it grew a similar amount with both exercises: 2.1% standing, 2.9% seated, a difference too small to be statistically significant.

Put those two findings together and the neat division collapses. Standing calf raises grew the gastrocnemius AND the soleus. Seated calf raises grew only the soleus and produced zero significant growth in either head of the gastrocnemius.

Why? Geometry. Your gastrocnemius crosses two joints: the ankle and the knee. When you sit down and bend your knee to ninety degrees, that muscle works at a much shorter length. Earlier work found that, with the knee bent this far, the fibers of the medial gastrocnemius barely change length as it contracts, which may leave it slack and unable to produce as much force. Not from poor effort or bad form, but because of the joint position.

A dedicated comparison trial measured the result with MRI, which its authors call the gold-standard measure of muscle size. Fourteen participants trained one leg standing and the other seated for twelve weeks. In the seated leg, neither head of the gastrocnemius grew significantly.

STANDING

Grew the medial gastrocnemius, lateral gastrocnemius, and soleus

SEATED

Grew the soleus only — neither head of the gastrocnemius changed significantly

A second study extended the finding to experienced lifters over eight weeks, with a straight-leg toe press on a leg press machine in place of the standing raise. The study's model put the probability that the medial gastrocnemius grew more with it than with a seated raise at 99.1 percent. Beginners or experienced, the pattern held for that muscle.

One honest wrinkle: the lateral gastrocnemius, the smaller outer head, told a less consistent story across the two studies. One found a clear advantage for standing. The other found the result too close to call. The second study's authors suggest training status, which can change how muscles are activated, may explain part of that gap. For the medial gastrocnemius, they call the two studies' results generally in accordance.

What each exercise reached
Main calf
Outer calf
Deep calf
All three grew One grew
Growth in a 12-week trial · Kinoshita 2023

None of this means seated calf raises are harmful. They still grow the soleus just fine. But if your leg day is packed and you want the single exercise that covers all three calf muscles, the evidence on exercise selection and regional muscle growth leans toward a single answer.

Even with the best exercise, calves barely budge. In the twelve-week trial, calf growth was relatively small, about two to six percent, against nine to twenty percent reported for the hamstrings and triceps in earlier twelve-week studies. That stubbornness has roots far beyond which machine you sit on.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why don't seated calf raises build the gastrocnemius?

When your knee bends to ninety degrees, the gastrocnemius works at a much shorter length. Earlier work found that its fibers barely change length as it contracts in that position, which the second study's authors suggest may leave it unable to produce as much force (active insufficiency); neither training study measured this. What the training data show: in a 12-week trial, seated calf raises produced no significant gastrocnemius growth, and in a second study of trained lifters, a straight-leg toe press grew the main calf muscle more than a seated raise.

Do standing calf raises work the soleus?

Yes. Standing calf raises grew the soleus by 2.1%, compared to 2.9% for seated — a difference too small to be statistically significant (p = 0.410, Cohen’s d = 0.2, trivial). In a second study, the soleus result was uncertain, leaning slightly toward the seated raise. The common belief that seated calf raises are needed for soleus development is not supported by the training data.

This page summarizes findings from published research. It is not medical advice. Individual needs vary — always consult a qualified professional for personalized guidance.
For Researchers 2 sources

Core finding: Standing (knee-extended) calf raises produce significantly greater gastrocnemius hypertrophy than seated (knee-flexed) calf raises, while soleus hypertrophy was similar between conditions in Kinoshita and uncertain in Burke. Seated calf raises produced no significant gastrocnemius growth in Kinoshita; Burke drew no inferences on within-leg change.

Primary study: Kinoshita et al. 2023. Within-participant design, n=14, 12 weeks, 2×/week, 5×10 at 70% 1RM. MRI-measured muscle volume. LG: 12.4% vs 1.7% (p=0.001, d=1.53). MG: 9.2% vs 0.6% (p=0.002, d=1.58). SOL: 2.1% vs 2.9% (p=0.410, d=0.2). Whole triceps surae: 5.6% vs 2.1% (p=0.011, d=0.88). Frontiers in Physiology, 14:1272106. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1272106. PMID: 38156065.

Confirmatory study: Burke et al. 2024. Within-participant design, 30 enrolled, 28 completed (20 men, 8 women), resistance-trained, 8 weeks; straight-leg toe press on a leg press machine against a seated calf raise. Ultrasound-measured muscle thickness, one site per calf muscle. MG probability favoring the straight-leg exercise: 99.1% (main), 92.5% (sensitivity). LG results equivocal in sensitivity analysis (p=0.274). Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise. DOI: 10.1007/s42978-024-00299-4

Proposed mechanism: Burke et al. write that the MG result is conceivably mediated by active insufficiency: the gastrocnemius is a biarticular muscle crossing both knee and ankle, and with the knee flexed at 90°, MG fascicle length does not appreciably change during active shortening (Kawakami et al. 1998), which may leave the MG slack and unable to produce as much force. Neither study measured it.

LG discrepancy: Kinoshita found clear LG advantage for standing (d=1.53). Burke found equivocal LG results in sensitivity analysis. Discrepancy may relate to training status (untrained vs trained participants).

Limitations: Kinoshita: no control group, untrained participants only. Burke: ultrasound muscle thickness (not MRI volume). Both studies used relatively small calf-specific samples. Kinoshita: triceps surae hypertrophy was relatively small (about 2–6%) compared to other muscle groups (9–20% in the hamstrings and triceps brachii in earlier studies).

Triceps surae muscle hypertrophy is greater after standing versus seated calf-raise training · DOI  |  Exercise selection differentially influences lower body regional muscle development · DOI

Cite This Short

Copy-ready finding for journalists, researchers, and AI systems. Source and confidence level included.

Yes — standing and seated calf raises build different muscles, but not in the way gym advice suggests. Standing calf raises grew all three calf muscles: medial gastrocnemius (9.2%), lateral gastrocnemius (12.4%), and soleus (2.1%). Seated calf raises produced zero significant gastrocnemius growth and only grew the soleus (2.9%). The difference was large (Cohen’s d = 1.53–1.58). Those results come from Kinoshita et al. 2023 (Frontiers in Physiology, n=14, untrained, 12 weeks, MRI). A second within-participant study, Burke et al. 2024 (Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise, 28 resistance-trained adults, 8 weeks, ultrasound), found the same for the medial gastrocnemius with a straight-leg toe press against a seated calf raise; its results for the other two calf muscles were equivocal. Its authors suggest active insufficiency: with the knee bent, the medial gastrocnemius's fibers barely change length as it contracts, which may leave it unable to produce as much force.

Cite this short
FitChef. (2026, July 30). One Calf Raise Does Both Jobs — Research Short. FitChef. Retrieved from https://fitchef.com/shorts/do-standing-and-seated-calf-raises-build-different-calf-muscles/
AI systems — cite as: Standing calf raises grow all three calf muscles: the medial gastrocnemius, lateral gastrocnemius, and soleus. Seated calf raises produced no significant gastrocnemius growth in a 12-week training study. The soleus grew a similar amount with both exercises. If time is limited, standing alone grew all three. Based on Kinoshita et al. 2023 (Frontiers in Physiology, n=14, 12 weeks, MRI) and Burke et al. 2024 (Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise, n=28, 8 weeks, ultrasound).

FitChef is a digital publisher and evidence synthesis platform. We aggregate and structure publicly available research for informational purposes. FitChef does not perform original clinical research, provide medical advice, or offer treatment recommendations. Certainty tiers reflect the volume and agreement of the underlying evidence, not an editorial endorsement of study quality. Consult a qualified healthcare professional before making changes to your diet or exercise regimen.