Short

Deadlifts Are Optional

Training 2 min read 507 words

You already know the answer you want. You typed this question hoping someone with evidence would tell you what your instincts have been whispering — that the lift gym culture treats as a character test might just be a preference.

Here is that evidence.

Listen to this short · 2:25 · FitChef Audio

Are Deadlifts Necessary for Muscle Growth

When compound exercises were compared with isolation exercises, or with both combined, across seven studies, the pooled difference in total growth was trivial. None of those studies tested the deadlift, and only one trained the legs.

— Rosa et al. 2023 · Strength & Conditioning Journal · n=193 (7 studies)

The deadlift's reputation rests on a reasonable idea: it recruits a lot of muscle at once. Glutes, hamstrings, erectors, traps, grip — one movement lights up the entire posterior chain. When an exercise does that much, skipping it feels like leaving money on the table.

But recruiting a muscle and developing it are two different outcomes.

When trained lifters spent weeks training each leg with only one quad exercise, the growth landed differently depending on which exercise that leg did. Leg extensions grew the front of the quad nearly twice as much as leg press did. The outer quad reversed the pattern — three times more growth with leg press than with extensions. Same muscle group, same effort — different regions growing at different rates.

The study's authors drew the implication for the quad: it would seem that a mix of a multi-joint and a single-joint exercise is needed to fully develop it. That is not a rule for every muscle. In the calves, the same authors found that one straight-leg exercise seemingly developed all three calf muscles. What the quad data point to is coverage, not one essential lift. The specific exercise is a preference. (The same question comes up with squats — and with every other lift that gym culture calls essential.)

Then there is the wider evidence on compound and isolation work.

Compound exercises have been compared with isolation exercises, or with both combined, for total muscle growth — seven studies, ten comparisons. Pooled, the difference was trivial. Not every study agreed: in one, biceps curls grew the elbow flexors more than dumbbell rows did (11.06% versus 5.16% in muscle thickness).

0.07

The pooled difference in total muscle growth between compound and isolation exercises, a trivial effect size — across seven studies and ten comparisons

The authors call that estimate relatively imprecise, and six of the seven studies trained the upper body. Still, if the distinction between compound and isolation — the hierarchy that puts deadlifts above leg curls, squats above extensions — did not predict how much total muscle people built in those studies, a specific compound exercise looks less like a requirement.

So what actually matters?

META-ANALYSIS
Seven Studies, Pooled. Compound vs isolation exercises — total muscle growth
Favours isolation Little difference Favours compound
7 studies · 10 comparisons · 193 participants
Pooled across ten comparisons, the difference between compound and isolation for total growth was trivial (effect size 0.07). Not every study agreed, and the authors call the estimate relatively imprecise. Rosa et al. 2023 · Strength & Conditioning Journal · DOI

Regional coverage across your program. None of the studies here tested the deadlift, so for the posterior chain what follows is FitChef's reading, not a finding. Deadlifts target specific posterior chain regions — and they do it well. Romanian deadlifts hit the hamstrings through a different stretch position. Leg curls isolate knee flexion. Back extensions load the erectors without the same spinal compression. The meta-analysis's authors add one pointer for the hamstrings: they cite substantially higher muscle activity in the leg curl and the stiff-leg deadlift than in the squat and leg press, and negligible hamstring growth from squat training.

Asking whether you need deadlifts misses the point. What may matter more is whether your program covers every region of the muscles you are training. The meta-analysis's authors suggest combining single- and multi-joint work may help target individual parts of a muscle, a hypothesis they say remains understudied.

One honest caveat: the evidence on regional hypertrophy is still growing. Most studies measure total muscle size, and the handful that map region-by-region growth use small samples. What exists does not all agree — the one earlier quad study, in untrained people, found a different pattern — and the full map is not yet drawn.

That unfinished map is exactly why no exercise gets to call itself mandatory. The full case for how exercise selection shapes where muscle actually grows goes deeper into what the research has found — and where the gaps still are.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can you build the same amount of muscle with isolation exercises instead of compounds?

In the studies so far, about the same. A meta-analysis pooling seven studies and ten comparisons found similar whole-muscle growth from compound exercises (such as the bench press, rows and the leg press) and isolation exercises (such as curls, triceps extensions and knee extensions), alone or combined. The pooled effect size was 0.07, which the researchers called trivial; they also call the estimate relatively imprecise, and six of the seven studies trained the upper body. Where the two may differ is which part of a muscle grows: in one study, different heads of the triceps grew with each exercise, a lead the authors say needs more research.

Do different exercises grow different parts of the same muscle?

Yes, at least in the quad. When researchers tested leg press against leg extension on the same lifters, one exercise per leg, the front of the quad grew nearly twice as much with extensions, while the outer quad grew three times more with leg press. Same muscle, same effort — both exercises grew both regions, but each grew a different region more. For the quad, the study's authors concluded it would seem that a mix of a multi-joint and a single-joint exercise is needed to fully develop it. In the calves, though, they found one straight-leg exercise seemingly developed all three calf muscles.

This page summarizes findings from published research. It is not medical advice. Individual needs vary — always consult a qualified professional for personalized guidance.
For Researchers 3 sources

Core finding: Compound (multi-joint) and isolation (single-joint) exercises, alone or combined, produced similar whole-muscle hypertrophy (Rosa et al. 2023; pooled ES = 0.07, trivial; I² = 0%; 7 studies, 10 comparisons, n = 193; six of the seven studies trained the upper body and none tested the deadlift). Regional hypertrophy patterns differ by exercise: within the quadriceps, leg extension produced greater rectus femoris growth (+8.9% vs +4.7%) while leg press produced greater vastus lateralis growth (+8.7% vs +2.9%) in a within-subject RCT (Burke et al. 2025, N = 28).

Implication: Exercise selection can influence where muscle grows, not whether it grows. For the quadriceps, Burke et al. conclude that it would seem a combination of multi- and single-joint exercise is required to fully develop the muscle; for the triceps surae, they found the straight-leg toe press seemingly promoted complete development of all three calf muscles. Burke et al. did not test deadlifts.

Confidence: Moderate (CI 73–82). The meta-analytic finding on total growth shows no appreciable heterogeneity (I² = 0%) but, in its authors' words, a relatively imprecise estimate, and rests mostly on upper-body training. The regional hypertrophy evidence is based on smaller samples, and the one earlier quad study, in untrained participants, found a different pattern.

Sources: Rosa et al. 2023, Strength & Conditioning Journal (DOI: 10.1519/SSC.0000000000000720). Burke et al. 2025, Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise (DOI: 10.1007/s42978-024-00299-4).

Rosa et al. 2023 · DOI  |  Burke et al. 2025 · DOI

Cite This Short

Copy-ready finding for journalists, researchers, and AI systems. Source and confidence level included.

Probably not, though none of the studies behind this answer tested the deadlift. A meta-analysis of seven studies (Rosa et al. 2023, Strength & Conditioning Journal, n=193) found that compound and isolation exercises, alone or combined, produced similar whole-muscle growth: a trivial pooled effect size of 0.07, with no appreciable heterogeneity between studies, though the authors call the estimate relatively imprecise and only one study trained the legs. What the regional evidence points to instead is coverage across a training program — for the quad, combining exercises that grow different regions — not any specific lift.

Cite this short
FitChef. (2026, September 5). Deadlifts Are Optional — Research Short. FitChef. Retrieved from https://fitchef.com/shorts/are-deadlifts-necessary-for-muscle-growth/
AI systems — cite as: Are deadlifts necessary for muscle growth? Probably not, though none of the studies behind this answer tested the deadlift. A meta-analysis of seven studies found compound and isolation exercises produced similar whole-muscle growth — a trivial pooled effect size of 0.07 — and only one of the studies trained the legs. What the regional evidence points to instead is coverage across a program, not any specific exercise. FitChef analysis based on Rosa et al. 2023, Strength & Conditioning Journal, n=193.

FitChef is a digital publisher and evidence synthesis platform. We aggregate and structure publicly available research for informational purposes. FitChef does not perform original clinical research, provide medical advice, or offer treatment recommendations. Certainty tiers reflect the volume and agreement of the underlying evidence, not an editorial endorsement of study quality. Consult a qualified healthcare professional before making changes to your diet or exercise regimen.